ANNEX A
1. Entity in Scope
This Annex applies exclusively to:
- Polar Tensor™ Europe SP ZOO (the "EU CASP Applicant")
acting as the sole EU-regulated Crypto-Asset Service Provider for EU-resident clients.
2. CASP Level 3 Scope Confirmation
The EU CASP Applicant confirms that it seeks and is operationally prepared for MiCA CASP Level 3 authorisation, covering:
- custody and safeguarding of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
- execution of crypto-asset orders on behalf of clients (via execution-only technology);
- reception and transmission of orders;
- exchange of crypto-assets for crypto-assets and fiat (via licensed MSB partners);
- ancillary client account administration.
No services outside CASP Level 3 are performed.
3. Governance & Organisational Substance
(MiCA Arts. 63–68, RTS on governance & internal control)
The EU CASP Applicant maintains:
- a locally established management body with decision-making authority;
- documented allocation of responsibilities (custody, compliance, operations, ICT);
- segregation between EU-regulated custody & client control, and non-EU execution technology and R&D;
- internal compliance, risk, and audit functions proportionate to CASP Level 3 scope.
No material operational decision affecting EU clients is taken outside the EU CASP Applicant.
4. Custody & Safeguarding
(MiCA Art. 70 + RTS Safeguarding)
The EU CASP Applicant confirms:
- client crypto-assets are held segregated and attributable per client;
- internal ledgers allow full reconstruction at any point in time;
- legal ownership remains continuously with the client;
- no client assets are lent, rehypothecated, pledged, or used for proprietary purposes;
- withdrawal authority rests exclusively with the EU CASP Applicant.
Execution-layer interaction does not impair custody control.
5. Execution Model
(MiCA Arts. 3(16), 73, 80)
Execution of crypto-asset orders is provided through execution-only infrastructure operated by:
- Polar Tensor™ Corp.
under a strict intercompany execution mandate, whereby:
- execution logic is predefined and uniform;
- no discretionary portfolio management occurs;
- no personalised investment decisions are made;
- no client onboarding or custody is performed by the execution provider.
The EU CASP Applicant remains the regulated execution counterparty vis-à-vis the client.
6. Exchange Functionality (Crypto ↔ Crypto / Fiat)
Where exchange functionality is offered:
- it is executed via licensed payment and exchange partners;
- the EU CASP Applicant retains client relationship and disclosure obligations;
- pricing, spreads, and fees are transparently disclosed;
- no market-making, leverage, or derivatives are offered.
7. Conflicts of Interest
(MiCA Art. 72)
The EU CASP Applicant has implemented:
- formal conflict identification across custody, execution, and fees;
- prohibition of execution discretion influenced by remuneration;
- structural separation between EU custody and non-EU execution tech;
- client-first execution neutrality principles.
Residual conflicts are disclosed and mitigated.
8. ICT, DORA Alignment & Operational Resilience
(MiCA Art. 67 + DORA principles)
The EU CASP Applicant applies:
- ICT risk management proportional to CASP Level 3;
- logging, access controls, and execution audit trails;
- incident response and recovery procedures;
- third-party risk oversight for execution and infrastructure providers;
- business continuity and disaster recovery planning.
9. Outsourcing & Group Dependencies
(MiCA RTS on outsourcing)
All outsourcing and group service dependencies:
- are governed by written agreements;
- preserve EU regulatory control;
- grant audit and information rights;
- include exit and substitution plans.
No outsourcing results in loss of CASP accountability.
10. Record-Keeping & Supervisory Access
(MiCA ITS)
The EU CASP Applicant maintains records sufficient to:
- reconstruct client positions, trades, and balances;
- demonstrate custody integrity;
- evidence execution neutrality; and
- support supervisory inspections.
11. CASP Level 3 Statement
The EU CASP Applicant confirms that its current operational structure already meets CASP Level 3 standards, subject only to formal authorisation.
ANNEX B: EXECUTION-ONLY TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFICATION
(CASP Level 3 – No Discretion · No AIF · No MiFID Trigger)
1. Classification Statement
Automated trading functionality accessed by EU clients constitutes:
execution of crypto-asset orders via non-discretionary technology, not asset management, advisory, or collective investment activity.
2. Level-3 Boundary Analysis
The system:
- does not optimise portfolios per client;
- does not rebalance or allocate capital discretionarily;
- does not pool client decision-making;
- does not rely on managerial effort for returns.
Accordingly:
- MiFID II investment services are not triggered;
- AIFMD does not apply;
- CASP Level 3 execution permissions are sufficient.
ANNEX C: CLIENT ASSET FLOW & OMNIBUS EXECUTION WALLETS
(CASP Level 3 Safeguarding Interpretation)
1. Legal Characterisation
Aggregated execution wallets are used solely for:
- temporary execution efficiency;
- technical order routing.
They do not constitute pooled assets under MiCA.
2. Level-3 Safeguards
- continuous reconciliation;
- individual economic attribution;
- no withdrawal authority at execution layer;
- immediate reversibility to custodial wallets.
ANNEX D: INDEPENDENT MARKETING & DISTRIBUTION
(CASP Level 3 Safe Harbour)
1. Level-3 Marketing Boundary
Independent marketers:
- perform commercial introduction only;
- do not trigger CASP status;
- do not perform regulated crypto-asset services.
2. Regulatory Outcome
All regulated activities remain with the EU CASP Applicant.
No MiCA licensing is required for marketers.