MiCA CASP Level 3 Readiness Statement

Custody · Execution · Exchange · Governance · ICT · Conduct

ANNEX A

1. Entity in Scope

This Annex applies exclusively to:

  • Polar Tensor™ Europe SP ZOO (the "EU CASP Applicant")

acting as the sole EU-regulated Crypto-Asset Service Provider for EU-resident clients.

2. CASP Level 3 Scope Confirmation

The EU CASP Applicant confirms that it seeks and is operationally prepared for MiCA CASP Level 3 authorisation, covering:

  • custody and safeguarding of crypto-assets on behalf of clients;
  • execution of crypto-asset orders on behalf of clients (via execution-only technology);
  • reception and transmission of orders;
  • exchange of crypto-assets for crypto-assets and fiat (via licensed MSB partners);
  • ancillary client account administration.

No services outside CASP Level 3 are performed.

3. Governance & Organisational Substance

(MiCA Arts. 63–68, RTS on governance & internal control)

The EU CASP Applicant maintains:

  • a locally established management body with decision-making authority;
  • documented allocation of responsibilities (custody, compliance, operations, ICT);
  • segregation between EU-regulated custody & client control, and non-EU execution technology and R&D;
  • internal compliance, risk, and audit functions proportionate to CASP Level 3 scope.

No material operational decision affecting EU clients is taken outside the EU CASP Applicant.

4. Custody & Safeguarding

(MiCA Art. 70 + RTS Safeguarding)

The EU CASP Applicant confirms:

  • client crypto-assets are held segregated and attributable per client;
  • internal ledgers allow full reconstruction at any point in time;
  • legal ownership remains continuously with the client;
  • no client assets are lent, rehypothecated, pledged, or used for proprietary purposes;
  • withdrawal authority rests exclusively with the EU CASP Applicant.

Execution-layer interaction does not impair custody control.

5. Execution Model

(MiCA Arts. 3(16), 73, 80)

Execution of crypto-asset orders is provided through execution-only infrastructure operated by:

  • Polar Tensor™ Corp.

under a strict intercompany execution mandate, whereby:

  • execution logic is predefined and uniform;
  • no discretionary portfolio management occurs;
  • no personalised investment decisions are made;
  • no client onboarding or custody is performed by the execution provider.

The EU CASP Applicant remains the regulated execution counterparty vis-à-vis the client.

6. Exchange Functionality (Crypto ↔ Crypto / Fiat)

Where exchange functionality is offered:

  • it is executed via licensed payment and exchange partners;
  • the EU CASP Applicant retains client relationship and disclosure obligations;
  • pricing, spreads, and fees are transparently disclosed;
  • no market-making, leverage, or derivatives are offered.

7. Conflicts of Interest

(MiCA Art. 72)

The EU CASP Applicant has implemented:

  • formal conflict identification across custody, execution, and fees;
  • prohibition of execution discretion influenced by remuneration;
  • structural separation between EU custody and non-EU execution tech;
  • client-first execution neutrality principles.

Residual conflicts are disclosed and mitigated.

8. ICT, DORA Alignment & Operational Resilience

(MiCA Art. 67 + DORA principles)

The EU CASP Applicant applies:

  • ICT risk management proportional to CASP Level 3;
  • logging, access controls, and execution audit trails;
  • incident response and recovery procedures;
  • third-party risk oversight for execution and infrastructure providers;
  • business continuity and disaster recovery planning.

9. Outsourcing & Group Dependencies

(MiCA RTS on outsourcing)

All outsourcing and group service dependencies:

  • are governed by written agreements;
  • preserve EU regulatory control;
  • grant audit and information rights;
  • include exit and substitution plans.

No outsourcing results in loss of CASP accountability.

10. Record-Keeping & Supervisory Access

(MiCA ITS)

The EU CASP Applicant maintains records sufficient to:

  • reconstruct client positions, trades, and balances;
  • demonstrate custody integrity;
  • evidence execution neutrality; and
  • support supervisory inspections.

11. CASP Level 3 Statement

The EU CASP Applicant confirms that its current operational structure already meets CASP Level 3 standards, subject only to formal authorisation.


ANNEX B: EXECUTION-ONLY TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFICATION

(CASP Level 3 – No Discretion · No AIF · No MiFID Trigger)

1. Classification Statement

Automated trading functionality accessed by EU clients constitutes:

execution of crypto-asset orders via non-discretionary technology, not asset management, advisory, or collective investment activity.

2. Level-3 Boundary Analysis

The system:

  • does not optimise portfolios per client;
  • does not rebalance or allocate capital discretionarily;
  • does not pool client decision-making;
  • does not rely on managerial effort for returns.

Accordingly:

  • MiFID II investment services are not triggered;
  • AIFMD does not apply;
  • CASP Level 3 execution permissions are sufficient.

ANNEX C: CLIENT ASSET FLOW & OMNIBUS EXECUTION WALLETS

(CASP Level 3 Safeguarding Interpretation)

1. Legal Characterisation

Aggregated execution wallets are used solely for:

  • temporary execution efficiency;
  • technical order routing.

They do not constitute pooled assets under MiCA.

2. Level-3 Safeguards

  • continuous reconciliation;
  • individual economic attribution;
  • no withdrawal authority at execution layer;
  • immediate reversibility to custodial wallets.

ANNEX D: INDEPENDENT MARKETING & DISTRIBUTION

(CASP Level 3 Safe Harbour)

1. Level-3 Marketing Boundary

Independent marketers:

  • perform commercial introduction only;
  • do not trigger CASP status;
  • do not perform regulated crypto-asset services.

2. Regulatory Outcome

All regulated activities remain with the EU CASP Applicant.

No MiCA licensing is required for marketers.